does it bother anyone else or is it just me the increasing number of times we are stopped actually all traffic is stopped, so developments can take priority to people trying to get to work or go about their day?
If u r the person doing the development its great. but surely its not totally a safety issue why traffic is stopped to let so many trucks, deliveries or who knows what take precedence in a development blocking people trying to drive.
does it bother anyone else that they have this sort of priority and control of our roads at any time of day ?
I guess another pet peeve is why councils sometimes make decisions that effect us being able to drive on roads. I thought roads are for driving on, yet clearly this is not true , the way some councils fills some normal suburban streets inexplicably with speed humps or traffic islands.
When they put traffic islands at the end of a street only allowing one lane of traffic it means that if you are stuck behind a right turning vehicle you could be waiting ages. why they block some lanes so u cant aswell turn left and not be blocked , on just normal streets, stuns me. does this bother anyone else- the decisions council makes for streets that means that they are no longer for easily driving on, which is what i thought streets are for. I know the excuse is its safety but i've been living in this area for decades and it surprises me the decisions and changes council sometimes thinks up, that then us drivers have to live with for decades after that impede smooth driving on average not dangerous roads.
does anyone else think roads are meant to actually be for driving on?
If u r the person doing the development its great. but surely its not totally a safety issue why traffic is stopped to let so many trucks, deliveries or who knows what take precedence in a development blocking people trying to drive.
does it bother anyone else that they have this sort of priority and control of our roads at any time of day ?
I guess another pet peeve is why councils sometimes make decisions that effect us being able to drive on roads. I thought roads are for driving on, yet clearly this is not true , the way some councils fills some normal suburban streets inexplicably with speed humps or traffic islands.
When they put traffic islands at the end of a street only allowing one lane of traffic it means that if you are stuck behind a right turning vehicle you could be waiting ages. why they block some lanes so u cant aswell turn left and not be blocked , on just normal streets, stuns me. does this bother anyone else- the decisions council makes for streets that means that they are no longer for easily driving on, which is what i thought streets are for. I know the excuse is its safety but i've been living in this area for decades and it surprises me the decisions and changes council sometimes thinks up, that then us drivers have to live with for decades after that impede smooth driving on average not dangerous roads.
does anyone else think roads are meant to actually be for driving on?