Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's the thing - I've only been investing for 5 years and yet to experience a bloody boom or real growth. All my properties are in good locations, 15km to CBD, walking distance to transport, etc. I think I have a while yet to experience growth with all these job losses and factories closing.
That's the thing - I've only been investing for 5 years and yet to experience a bloody boom or real growth. All my properties are in good locations, 15km to CBD, walking distance to transport, etc. I think I have a while yet to experience growth with all these job losses and factories closing.
For these reasons shares win for me, more focused on income these days. Conservative leverage is ok & I don't see shares as dangerous at all. Have more in shares than property now.With shares you get
- no land tax
- no stamp duty
- no broken toilets
- franking credits
- ease of sale
- can sell part of your parcel
But,
- dangerous to leverage
- dangerous to hold
You're still ahead though? Surely...and well ahead of non-investors.
I'll take them off your hands if you dont want them.
Could someone tell me what the point is in investing in property? Just received my land tax bill today for $7500! I understand many of you would be paying triple this amount but it seems to me the Government does not want you to get ahead in life. They want us to be self managed retirees but what are the incentives of working hard, investing now for the future, and then to be taxed to the max.
Does any one agree or am I just grumpy for no reason?
This is what I am asking myself, am I ahead of an average Joe with no interest in investing? Currently I would say no , perhaps ask me in another 5 years.
Like any long term plan, the first couple of years are hard. Your concentration in one city with properties that are probably lower cashflow doesn't help.
Most don't last. If you do, though, the rewards are there. Usually.
Good point - I need to learn to expand a little and think outside the square.
I have one in Heidelberg Heights and one in Cloverdale, Western Australia. Land tax in WA is much lower and rents are higher. I agree with you, as a yearly slug, it's a fair chunk of cash. Oh yeah, rates are lower in vic. You should see my rates bill in WA!All my properties are largish blocks (future development sites) which I guess doesn't help too. Perhaps start looking at units....
Don't get me wrong I was expecting the bill and had the money saved for it. I was just thinking for along the lines of $5k than $7500K
Funny thing is I have 2 properties that are 1 minute apart. same size block yet one is valued $8k more according to the SRO. My Father who lives 2 minutes away by walk has his valued $50K less. Same size block, suburb, etc...
Could someone tell me what the point is in investing in property? Just received my land tax bill today for $7500! I understand many of you would be paying triple this amount but it seems to me the Government does not want you to get ahead in life. They want us to be self managed retirees but what are the incentives of working hard, investing now for the future, and then to be taxed to the max.
I have lost my passion for property and no longer believe you can make a return from buy and hold.
When you purchase a property their is stamp duty.
When you hold their is land tax, rates, water rates, insurance, maintenance.
When you decide to sell their is CGT.
It seems to me the tax man gets more of the cut than me??
I am better off working 9 to 5, blow my money now and enjoy life and get the pension when I am 65.
Does any one agree or am I just grumpy for no reason?
Land tax is a PITA....
I own around $3m in residential property and pay a land tax bill of around $500.
Stamp duty is an upfront cost, so its up to you: do you buy or not buy, its a totally controllable cost, no problem on my behalf.
CGT is Australia is ok so long as you hold for at least one year.
Tax man definitely doesn't get his 'fair' share from me, mainly because of the difference between assessable profits and cash flow.
My residential portfolio's are all profitably geared (from a cash flow perspective). New purchases are always at a minimum cash flow neutral. I have no 'negatively geared' cash flow properties even when they are first purchased.
Land tax is a PITA. And we have two back to back with a $30K value difference.
Can you sell one of your places to your wife? Do you have a wife? There are all sorts of implications and costs to consider, but this could spread your assets between two people and save you some money (and I think no transfer duty in Vic???)