Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has anyone used the following programs ?
Buildsoft "Cubit"
Cost X
Eclipse
Looking at new software for work, the demonstrations are ok but you never really know until you start using them, so a bit feedback would be helpful.
Chomp
I support Cost X and Constructor in an IT capacity. They both seem kinda crap to me
A couple use Timberline, seems ok, but not sure if thats the kinda thing you're after?
My lecturer at UTS was Jackie Fogg, the designer of Buildsoft. So I am biased.
At the time, it was the only package which replicated a BOQ as it was designed by builders who just happened to hold computer science degrees.
Now most packages are based on this format.
Is your brief only to get an estimating package or something which integrates ordering, cost accounting, reporting etc as well?
Other packages include databuild, cordells etc. Television could help out here.
I reckon if you ask for a 2 week trial license they would let you have a run, wouldn't they?
I used CostX at uni and on-screen takeoff is handy and saves doubling up. The ability to link each measurement to each element of the plan was great, especially for someone who is just learning and prone to missing things. Easy way to show the boss your exact takeoff and for them to point out any errors. I've looked at Cubit a bit and like that it allows you to essentially draw a model off of the plans, should help with silly mistakes.
At work, I do my quantity take-offs with Bluebeam Revu and then transfer those quantities in to Buildsoft's "Global Estimating System" (essentially just a layered excel spreadsheet). I'd much prefer to use Cubit or CostX, but I can only suggest change, not force it.
My company doesn't use any particularly advanced software, I believe mainly due to the Senior guys being just that... senior. Why change from the system that works for them? They have no significant driver for them at this stage and so carry on with rulers and paper. They still win plenty of work without worrying about dealing with the frustration of implementing new software.
I think there's also some reservations around Cubit because it's not backwards compatible with Buildsoft's older filing system? So if you get provided with a BOQ from a QS, and it's in an EOX format, it won't transfer (or gets muddled) when trying to load it in Cubit?
I know that in my portion of the industry, BIM takeoff isn't particularly relevant at the moment so I don't include that as a selling point. Developers aren't willing to give Consultants enough time/money to develop accurate BIM models in the first place, so trying to do a takeoff from second rate information = bad idea.
With regards to Scott's comments about further applications (integrating it in to ordering, project accounting etc.) as you can probably gather, there's nothing like that around here. Just print out the bill, hand it to the CA and let them reshuffle it as they wish.
So there's my general response, as clear as mud.
If you do get a free trial or make a decision, let us know what you think?
I support Cost X and Constructor in an IT capacity. They both seem kinda crap to me
A couple use Timberline, seems ok, but not sure if thats the kinda thing you're after?